April 2017 – Adaptiv

Month: April 2017

Use This Simple Technique To Make Better Trade Decisions

April 24, 2017April 13, 2022

One of the most important jobs of a market participant is risk management. If you’re unable to identify when your position is wrong, then you shouldn’t be entering a position to begin with. Would we ever enter a crowded room without identifying where the exits are? I don’t think so. We have the same responsibility when entering a new position. At 360 Investment Research, when we enter a new position, we identify risk (and potential reward) by looking left. By looking left on a price chart, we can identify previous changes in supply and demand, which can give clues on where demand or support could appear. In a previous post, we used this simple technique to identify important levels on the S&P 500, one of the most watched indices and favorite proxy for discussing the U.S. stock market overall. By looking left, we can identify when buying momentum wanes and when selling pressure has entered the market. For example, if over a certain time period, price is making a series of lower highs and lower lows, we know sellers have more urgency than buyers for that time period. There is more supply than demand and price is trying to discover where the buyers live. So by looking left, we are using economic law (not opinion) to guide our investment decisions, entries, and exits. Using price removes mystery (and emotion) from our trade book. Let’s go through this exercise with the S&P 500 on daily and weekly time frames to identify where we are with the current market.

First, here’s the daily chart of the S&P 500:

When we look left, we can see price made of series of higher highs and higher lows from November through March. On March 1st, this important index recorded a new all-time-high. A series of higher highs and higher lows is indicative of a bull market. Since then, however, the characteristics have changed. They S&P 500 has recorded a series of lower lows and lower highs. Until this sequence is broken, the S&P 500 is in a downtrend on a daily timeframe. There’s no sugar coating it. Facts are facts and we’re not entitled to our own facts. Until the S&P 500 records a higher high and higher low, it’s in a downtrend on a daily timeframe. A good start towards this effort would be a close above the downward momentum trendline (in solid green). In addition, a close above 2368 would lock in a higher high with only a lower low needed to confirm an uptrend sequence.

Now for the weekly timeframe:

When looking left at the weekly data, it’s clear the S&P 500 is currently in a series of higher highs and higher lows. Can the market be in a downtrend on the daily timeframe and an uptrend on the weekly timeframe? Absolutely. In fact, that’s exactly what we have here. By looking left on both the daily and weekly timeframes, we can gain a better understanding of market trends. It’s not the only thing we look at, but it’s a big piece of evidence. And the current assessment has the S&P 500 in a daily downtrend within the friendly confines of a weekly uptrend. In essence, we’re in a correction within a larger uptrend. Price is moving downward in search of buyers. This is normal market behavior. Trees don’t grow to the moon and markets don’t go up every single week without periods of correction.

Where could this market potentially find buyers? Simple. Look left. We can quickly identify buyers have shown up near the 2330 level. On both the daily and weekly timeframes, that’s an important level to watch. Below 2330 and the next level of support for the S&P 500 resides somewhere between 2235 and 2265 (note: 2235 is also the value of the 200-day simple moving average, a common area of institutional support). Further correction into this area would still fall within the framework of a normal pullback in an uptrending market. On the other side of the equation, if buyers can provide enough demand here to break the sequence of lower lows on the daily timeframe (pushing the S&P 500 to a daily close above 2369), this makes an attempt at the weekly high of 2383 more likely.

As part of our every-day process as market participants, we need to identify sequences of lows and highs. This exercise provides valuable information to help us remain on the right side of the trade.

As always, you can get real-time updates and commentary about this development and many more opportunities here: @360Research

AND, you’ve got FREE access to an investing tool we’ve created, The Ultimate ETF Cheat Sheet. It’s an easy-to-use resource guide.

Disclaimer: Nothing in this article should be construed as investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell a security. You invest based on your own decisions. Everything in this post is meant for educational and entertainment purposes only. I or my affiliates may hold positions in securities mentioned in this blog. Please see our Disclosure page for full disclaimer.

Bonds

Here’s Why You Should Be Long The Long Bond.…

April 17, 2017April 13, 2022

Disbelief is not an investment plan. I have yet to come across a successful investor or trader whose main investment philosophy is solely, “this won’t end well.” We can have all the strong opinions we want, but I’ll let you in on a little secret. Markets don’t care what we think. Markets are going to do what markets are going to do. We cannot bend them to our will. The faster we check our opinions (and pride) at the door and humble ourselves to the all-knowing market forces of supply and demand, the sooner we can begin to profit from objective facts and avoid losses generated by subjective opinions. Over the past few months, a very popular subjective opinion has reached a crescendo: higher rates/yields are all but certain going forward. As usual, this narrative became popular after the objective facts were already in motion. Beginning in July 2016, long bond yields (aka 20+ year U.S. Treasury yields) were rocketing upward as long duration bonds were selling off hard. Only after this move did the media begin touting lower bond prices and higher yields. Prices drive narratives, not the other way around. For example, with a solid bond sell-off already in motion, the financial media informed the investing public that higher yields were all but certain for the foreseeable future. Take a look at their helpful timing below. You can’t make this stuff up.

See how that works? Price first. “News” second. As soon as you realize how this sequential relationship works, the more you’ll be able to filter the “news” you consume. Is there a better way? Absolutely. Study objective facts instead. In other words, study price. It knows more than we do. In this case, the price of bonds knows more than we do. Conversely, yields know more than we do. As a refresher, yields work inversely to bonds. When bond prices rise, their corresponding yields drop.

What does supply and demand for 20+ year Treasuries look like right now? Here’s the weekly chart of TLT, an ETF that does a good job performing similarly to 20+ year Treasuries.

As you can see, after reaching all-time highs in July 2016, bonds began selling off in earnest. Because of the inverse relationship between bonds and their yields, this move caused yields to rise sharply. Only after this took place did financial news pundits begin pounding the table regarding higher yields and the consensus become rates would continue to move higher in 2017.

But after the rapid selloff in bonds, we’ve seen them stabilize sideways for several months. Meanwhile, consensus public opinion is loud: “higher rates during 2017 are a certainty!” This strong opinion has been matched with strong positioning. An especially high amount of investors are shorting long duration bonds. This means they are placing wagers that bond prices will continue to fall. With record short bond positions, this important credit instrument is sitting on upside jet fuel. What do we mean? Basically, if bonds rose enough in price it could trigger a short squeeze, a scenario in which shorts are forced to cover their losing position by buying bonds. This causes a feedback loop in which bond prices rise quickly while short-sellers continually scramble to cover their positions. Here’s the daily chart of TLT:

Three days ago, it broke above an area of supply, which acted as resistance four times before. This breakout is significant and is taking place when most are not expecting it. If this recent breakout requires short sellers to cover their positions, it’s going to throw jet fuel onto the demand fire. Above 122 on TLT, it makes sense to own long duration treasuries. Below that level, we’d be on the wrong side of the trade. The longer demand pushes and holds TLT above 122, the more likely we revisit the gap breakdown near 129.

Right now, chances are, if you asked your financial advisor, banker, friend, grandma, or typical TV pundit, they would all say they’re expecting higher rates going forward. Anecdotally, I have it on good authority during this year’s Market Technician Association’s Symposium in New York, they asked for a show of hands when asked: “do you think rates will be higher at the end of this year?” I was not there but the entire room raised their hand. This room is filled with incredibly smart people. And all of them raised their hand. All. Of. Them. Don’t take what I’m implying here as a slam on the consensus demonstrated or the intellect of those in the room. Rather, I’ll go out of my way to highlight the intellectual horsepower of any one of the individuals in attendance is multiple factors above of my two-cycle excuse for gray matter. These are extremely smart people and their collective opinion is higher yields are on their way. Are they right or are they wrong? I have no idea. It’s not about being right or wrong anyway. It’s about being on the right side of the trade. Price has the final say. Accordingly, we should be watching long duration treasuries with a simple game plan: own TLT above 122 (and watch the corresponding yield drop). Below that, it’s hands off while the rise in yields continues to fuel consensus.

As always, you can get real-time updates and commentary about this development and many more opportunities here: @360Research

AND, you’ve got FREE access to an investing tool we’ve created, The Ultimate ETF Cheat Sheet. It’s an easy-to-use resource guide.

Breakdown

This Is How The Relationship Between Lumber And Gold…

April 10, 2017April 13, 2022

Many investors tend to focus on asset-class specific study to gain an edge. They attempt to obtain outperformance based on factors directly related to the asset class being studied. This is an appropriate practice and can provide valuable insight. But in this post, similar to last week’s article on the relationship between Copper and Latin American equities, we’re going to look at the relationship between Lumber and Gold. Specifically, we’re going to follow-up on previous research showing the relationship between Lumber and Gold contain insights into risk-seeking and risk-averse behavior in stocks. The Lumber/Gold relationship is not a novel idea. This important connection was brought to the fore by Charlie Bilello and Michael Gayed in their 2015 NAAIM Wagner Award Winning Paper, “Lumber: Worth Its Weight In Gold.” Charlie and Michael are extremely smart asset managers with strong thought leadership when it comes to actively managing funds. We can’t hold their intellectual jocks, but we can use their research and look into the current state of Lumber and Gold to find another piece of evidence for managing risk in today’s market. In their research, they find:

As Lumber outperforms Gold, equities tend to exhibit an upward bias and have lower volatility. These are conditions that are conducive towards maintaining higher exposure to risk assets. As Gold outperforms Lumber, the opposite tends to be true, whereby the inclusion of lower beta assets in a portfolio increases overall return and lowers volatility at the time it is needed most. The relationship between Lumber and Gold helps to answer the most critical question for active asset managers: when to take more risk (“play offense”) and when to take less risk (“play defense”) in an investment portfolio – before it’s too late.

The relationship between Gold and Lumber can give us valuable insight into U.S. stock market volatility and risk. As market participants, we can use this relationship to give us an edge. Simply put, their findings highlight when Lumber is outperforming Gold, it is a risk-on (offensive) characteristic for stocks. In this scenario, investors can be more aggressive with their equity exposure. Oppositely, when Gold is outperforming Lumber, this is risk-off (defensive) behavior and investors should take a more protective stance. Accordingly, it makes sense for us to dig into how Lumber and Gold are performing and conclude with a review of their relative strength to each other.

Here’s the weekly chart of Gold:

Gold remains in a downtrend from weekly perspective. Since 2011, everyone’s favorite precious metal has been making lower highs and lower lows, the very definition of a downtrend. That is, until recently. In early 2017, Gold locked in a higher lower. This was a productive step towards trend change. If it can break through the upper green trend line, we’ll have a break in trend momentum. A close above $1,375 would establish a higher high and a potential new uptrend underway. For now, it remains within compression (two converging trendlines). Out of this compression will come a move that most likely will determine Gold’s future in the weeks and months ahead.

As for Lumber, here’s its respective weekly chart:

Lumber broke out of a downtrend in early 2016. In fact, Lumber’s higher low in February 2016 coincided with a bottom in U.S. stocks. Never discount coincidence. Since then, Lumber has continued to establish higher highs and higher lows in price. Just last week, it broke from a month’s long consolidation to make an attempt at the early 2013 highs. A break above the $400 level would be extremely productive for Lumber overall.

Now, here’s what you’ve been waiting for. The weekly chart of Lumber : Gold. As a friendly reminder, when Lumber is outperforming Gold, the ratio rises. When Gold is outperforming Lumber, the ratio falls.

Even going back to 2011, we can see the ratio bottom in August of that same year. Do you know what also bottomed at the very same time? The S&P 500. The ratio broke out of a long-term downtrend in late 2012, which preceded the S&P 500 breaking to fresh all-time-highs in August 2013. Similarly, this important ratio broke down in late 2014, which preceded an S&P 500 breakdown in July 2015. More recently, we’ve seen Lumber outperform Gold and establish a higher low in February 2016 and breakout of an intermediate downtrend in November 2016. Since then, the ratio has been continuing its movement upwards signaling risk-on behavior in stocks and diminishing volatility overall. We’ve definitely seen stocks take off since then and volatility crushed with one of the calmest markets in history during this time frame. Just last week, as Lumber broke towards its 2013 highs, this ratio also broke out to a level not seen in eight years.

The next few weeks will be crucial for this relationship and the significance it carries for equities overall. Lumber needs to break through the $400 level in order to ratio to hold onto its recent breakout. If Lumber : Gold can hold onto these recent highs, it will likely mean further upside for equities (especially high beta equities) and suppression of volatility. On the flip side, if Lumber falters here while Gold continues to move upward, the ratio will roll over, signaling a need to take a defensive stance in your portfolio.

As always, you can get real-time updates and commentary about this development and many more opportunities here: @360Research

AND, you’ve got FREE access to an investing tool we’ve created, The Ultimate ETF Cheat Sheet. It’s an easy-to-use resource guide.

Commodity

Use This Secret Key To Unlock Latin America

April 3, 2017April 13, 2022

At 360 Investment Research, we take a top-down, weight-of-evidence approach to markets. One key feature of this method is looking at relationships across asset classes to identify opportunities and manage risk. This intermarket analysis allows us to gain a big picture perspective of demand and supply in markets across the globe. After all, this is 2017, we have access to markets and investment vehicles our parents only dreamed of. With a click of a button, we can own commodities, currencies, sectors, industries, regional markets, you name it. Never before have individual investors had so much available to them for gaining investment knowledge, finding great investment opportunities, and the ability to take advantage of them at such a low cost. With the advent of ETFs, common investors can invest in pretty much whatever they want. Want to buy timber? Go for it. There’s an ETF for that (CUT). Is that ETF ticker not clever enough? Try WOOD. How about palladium? Got you covered (PALL). Want to invest in foreign markets like South Korea? Be my guest (EWY). Need it currency hedged. Got that too (HEWY). Do you really like coffee? Try JO. With sugar? Sure! (SGG). Before we get too carried away, investors also need to understand that ETFs are not a holy grail for accessing certain investment themes. In the words of investing legend, Peter Lynch, “Know what you own, and know why you own it.” The “why we own it” is easy: we’re here to make money. It’s the first part of the equation that can be a bit tricky. “Know what you own.” Investors need to understand that ETFs are notorious for tracking difference and tracking error. If you want to get into the minutiae, you can read up on those here. And since this article is focusing on a commodity, you should read this piece to understand the effects of contango and backwardation on commodity ETFs. Even with the aforementioned limitations, we can use ETFs to our advantage. Now, let’s dig into the main focus of this article, the secret key to unlocking Latin America: Copper

First, we need to acknowledge the weakness in Latin American stocks from April 2011 – January 2016. For five years, Latin America was a hot mess. Using the ETF for Latin America (ILF) as our proxy, we can witness this classic downtrend first hand.

While U.S. equities were rallying, Latin American equities were getting crushed. Not until early 2016, did the trend of lower highs and lower lows reverse into a series of higher highs and higher lows. Recently, demand has pushed Latin American prices to levels not seen since 2015. Not only did ILF breakout on an absolute basis, it accomplished the same on a relative basis to U.S. stocks. Take a look.

Since the beginning of 2016, Latin America via ILF has been outperforming the United States via SPY (proxy for S&P 500). This is an important development and as long as Latin America continues to make higher highs and higher lows above a 40-week simple moving average on both an absolute and relative basis, it makes sense to own Latin American stocks.

What does Copper have to do with all of this? Awesome question. There are 19,100,000 metric tonnes of Copper mined each year. Two of the top three, and four of the top 15, producers of Copper are within the Latin American region: Chile, Peru, Mexico, Brazil. Roughly 40% of the world’s Copper originates from the four aforementioned countries. [1] It would make sense that if the demand for Copper increased, it could bode well for these important players in LatAm. The opposite would also apply. Here’s the weekly chart of Copper using JJC, which tries to track the Bloomberg Copper Subindex Total Return. It’s not a perfect instrument, as we previously highlighted, but it’s good enough for our analysis here.

Look somewhat familiar? It should. The visualization of supply and demand (aka chart) looks very similar to that of Latin America. To make it easy on you, here’s the weekly chart of Copper placed directly over the same timeframe for Latin America.

It’s quickly apparent there is a strong relationship between the supply and demand for Copper and the supply and demand for Latin American Equities. They are not 100% correlated, but the tops and bottoms (aka changes in supply and demand) mirror each other. It’s not clear whether one asset class leads the other. At a minimum, however, they’re significantly coincident. Never discount coincidence. By studying the price of one, we can gather insight into the price of the other. If we’re long Latin American equities, it makes sense to pay close attention to Copper as well. And if Copper were to breakdown from its recent consolidation, it wouldn’t make much sense to have a long position in Latin American equities.

Since the large move in November of last year, Copper has been consolidating its gains. This can be productive. However, if Copper were to breakdown from this consolidation, the message of supply and demand would be clear. If selling pressure pushes Copper below the lower trendline (in green) or the major support near 28.50, Latin America would likely be in lockstep, dropping below 30 itself. Either of the aforementioned scenarios would likely mean even lower prices for both during the next few months.

Watch Copper carefully here. There’s no need to fight the tape. Higher prices in Copper likely mean higher prices in Latin American stocks. The opposite also applies. Make sure you’re on the right side of the trade.

As always, you can get real-time updates and commentary about this development and many more opportunities here: @360Research

AND, you’ve got FREE access to an investing tool we’ve created, The Ultimate ETF Cheat Sheet. It’s an easy-to-use resource guide.

[1] Source: https://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/commodity/copper/mcs-2017-coppe.pdf